On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Norbert > > I can tell you that I was exactly concerned about the same point and that we > are talking about it since a couple of months. > Nicolas implemented projects and privacy to support people wanted to do > private business (yes we want to support it). > Now he got stuck because of a problem in smalltalkhub and more important a > bug in the cog vm. > I do not know what is the status of this one. we (Igor and me) fight against this bug 2 days... and we failed, for now :( I need to prepare an image to reproduce the error, so Eliot can take a look. Esteban > The idea is that soon (probably next week) a new version of smalltalkhub will > get out. > > Stef > > On Nov 22, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a >> user? >> >> I just saw that Francois moved the MongoTalk from squeaksource to >> smalltalkhub. With the move the project moved into francois' projects. That >> seems like a step back at first. In squeaksource projects are global and >> have certain roles attached. Thus making it easier to shift responsibility. >> Especially when a user takes over a project and then stops working on it >> what would be the workflow for this? Can projects be moved? Do we need to >> copy? >> I can see that there is a tension to mimick github. But in github I just >> fork a project under my own account where it can reside even if the original >> author abandoned the project. What would be a good way to handle that common >> use case? >> >> thanks, >> >> Norbert > >
