On 14 February 2013 18:10, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> wrote: > That means you probably need to change some graphics primitives. > > If you want to go this way (have mathematical geometric objects), then > I think you're on the step off Juan Morphic 3... > well, how you can reason about intersecting rectangles without using geometry?
i do not want a rectangle which is not a rectangle in common sense, but rectangle in "our" sense, just because it fits us better. > Nicolas -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
