On 14 February 2013 17:22, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 February 2013 18:10, Nicolas Cellier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That means you probably need to change some graphics primitives. >> >> If you want to go this way (have mathematical geometric objects), then >> I think you're on the step off Juan Morphic 3... >> > well, how you can reason about intersecting rectangles without using geometry?
I think Nicolas means intervals over discrete values - integers - versus intervals over continuous values - reals. frank > i do not want a rectangle which is not a rectangle in common sense, > but rectangle in "our" sense, > just because it fits us better. > > >> Nicolas > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
