> On 05 Apr 2015, at 10:46, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 04/04/2015 18:02, stepharo a écrit :
>> Thierry
>>
>> this means that generating ring objects would help you?
>
> Maybe. Or maybe unifying Ring with what RB already does with its models
> (RBClass, etc...), and ensuring that Opal can work with those (at least do
> the bindings part, count the literals, etc...).
>
> I feel like Pharo has three competing ways of modeling software items:
> MCDefinition stuff, Ring, RB stuff.
>
Yes! We should look at unifying RB and Ring…
Marcus
