Hi Esteban I’m new and may be wrong and apologise if so … !
It just looked like the Crono package has a few things I didn’t expect : * CrApplicationStarter * CrGtkConfiguration * CrWindowConfiguration * SpPresenter extension firstResponder * SpWindowPresenter extensions (2) These ‘Cr’ classes seem to have some more general purpose behaviours that other SpApplications could use? And I would have thought the Gtk configuration would be outside Crono too? Also, presumably the extensions are candidates for repackaging outside/above Crono ….? This may be just a naming and packaging thing rather than any criticism of design. In summary, as a simple consumer of the framework there was (some) surprising detail in the Crono package and classes that didn’t seem relevant to any new application I would be writing. Hence I would have hoped not to have to clone these details (or even deal with them…). Does that sound fair? - or do I have the wrong end of the stick !! Cheers Mark
