Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
I developed a bunch of time stuff for Tango, but a lot of it was based on the existing code. I pretty much recreated the existing API, modeled after C#'s TimeSpan and DateTime. We can start from there too, since the source isn't easily available, and the API is pretty well described via msdn. Just whoever does it, document that you never used Tango, and keep good records. The problem with "staying away from tango" is that any good time library is going to be close to Tango's API (I think that's why SHOO's is!). I find the idea that Tango has issues with this code to be completely asinine. Like Andrei said, it's computing dates and times, it's not rocket science. I checked the complicated code against Tango's (converting a time stamp into date components), and it's obviously not copied. I don't think I will be contributing to Tango ever again. I don't want to risk any more copyright infringement... The only thing that is "copied" is the API, and even that isn't source compatible.
I just want to reiterate my experience with lawyers is that "I never looked at the source code" is an effective defense against charges of infringement. When I said that to the roomful of lawyers coming to do due diligence on some software they were buying from me, they closed their briefcases, said "that's all we needed to hear", and left.
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
