I agree with you, the changes are not good, but the only way it will change is 
if it hits eBay in the wallet.  
 
Not being able to give buyers negative feedback would result in more accurate 
feedback in very, very few cases.  The guy that sold me a cracked cylinder 
record that was cracked when he packed it and lied about it having insurance 
got positive feedback from me to avoid ruining my 100% feedback.  Now I do not 
deal with clowns that leave mean feedback and I have been happy.
 
But for the most part this would hurt the seller.  
 
http://www.toolhaus.org/ 
 
Lets you see what negative feedback a person gives and receives.Steve



> > I got a notice from ebay a week or so ago about the impending changes. > It 
> > looks like I may want to curb my ebay selling. The idea that buyers > could 
> > be immune from bad feedback is ridiculous and the new fees will be > 
> > brutal.> > -Thatcher> > john robles wrote:> > I have left negative feedback 
> > for buyers - has something changed??> >> > Albert <[email protected]> 
> > wrote: wondered about this too. What is Ebays rationale for not allowing 
> > sellers > > to leave negative feed back on buyers? can somebody comment? Al 
> > Menashe> > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eric Boyles" 
> > <[email protected]>> > To: "Antique Phonograph List" > >> > Sent: Friday, 
> > February 01, 2008 4:40 PM> > Subject: [Phono-L] OT - Ebay rebellion> >> >> 
> > > > >> Looks like there is a big push back on the upcoming Ebay 
> > changes......> >>> >> 
> > http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/smbusiness/ebay_fee_hike.fsb/index.htm?postversion=2008013116>
> >  >>> >> It appears there is a orchestrated event asking sellers not to list 
> > and > >> buyers not to bid during the week of Feb 20-27. It may get > >> 
> > interesting......> >> Eric> >>> >> 
> > _______________________________________________> >> Phono-L mailing list> 
> > >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org> >>> >>> >> -- > >> Internal Virus Database 
> > is out-of-date.> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus 
> > Database: > >> 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 8/15/2007 4:55 PM> >>> >> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> 
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
From [email protected]  Fri Feb  1 19:48:30 2008
From: [email protected] ([email protected])
Date: Fri Feb  1 19:56:11 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Intro, scrap drives, etc.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

I just subscribed to the list and wanted to do a brief info; someone on
the 78-C list pointed me here.

I've been catching up on the list archives and noted a recent discussion
about scrap drives and how many horns and phonographs succumed to the War
effort.  I'll mention that, for me at least, one of the more heartbreaking
things about the drives was the fact that many original metal parts were
thrown out by RCA and other companies.  I did some research on an artist
named Dwight Fiske that had several 78's custom pressed by RCA in the
early 30's and the original index cards in the BMG archives noted when the
masters for these were donated for scrap; it's tough to find decent copies
of these today.

I'm Randy Riddle and live in central NC.  Primarily my interests are in
collecting records, but I have some vintage machines - a tabletop and
portable Victrolas and a portable (?) Lear wire recorder that also plays
78s.  I'm interested in reading some of the in's and out's of the machines
themselves.

I've also become interested in collecting 16" transcription discs recently
and I'm trying to decide on an inexpensive modern turntable to play those
as well as my 78's.  If anyone has experience with KAB's Transcriber 2 or
the Rek-O-Kut CVS-16, I'd be interested in talking with you off the list.
(I tried a vintange Gates broadcast table a few years back and wasn't
pleased with all the rumble, btw.)

Randy


Reply via email to