At 02:20 PM 3/8/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
>At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>Why not bzip2_?
>*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ !
>If gz_ then bz_ or bz2_.
>Am I wrong or too fastidious ?

No, because gz_ has existed for a long time. If we'd give it a name today 
we'd probably call it gzip_* but it's too late. We can do the right thing 
for bzip2.


PHP Development Mailing List <>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to