ext/gd is more popular then imagick. And, seriously, I
wouldn't use imagick if I've read the code carefully. It's
not yet production quality.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:54:11AM +0200, Daniel Lorch wrote :
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, the intention was never to remove the ability to link against the
> > system GD lib.
> > -Rasmus
>
> why not replace GD by imagemagick which is better anyway?
>
> http://www.imagemagick.org
> http://pear.php.net/manual/en/pecl.imagick.php
>
> -daniel
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
"Mind if I MFH ?" "What QA did you do on it?" "the usual?" "ah... none :)"
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
