Hi, >> why not replace GD by imagemagick which is better anyway?
> Have you looked under the skirts of ImageMagick? It is one of the > poorest-written libraries I have seen. Have you ever tried to do something productive with GD? It is one of the poorest tools I have ever seen. Seriously: imagemagick can do *ALOT* more than GD. -daniel -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
