* Daniel Lorch wrote: > If GD was so great, why do products like typo3 and "gallery" rather > use imagemagick? Maybe because it's more feature-rich, supports 68 > formats and can do ALOT of effects?
Yep, but I don't see a reason why GD should be thrown away. -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
