Hi I have no problem with that, but the old functions should not be deprecated, it's the W3C-Standard way. And if i understood it correctly, both methods (name and nodeName) can be used for the same...
chregu On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Joseph Tate wrote: > A bug report or two have been made regarding function names in attribute > nodes. Taking a look, nodes have the following access functions: > > node_name > node_type > node_value > > etc. However attribute nodes have the following access functions: > > name > value > specified > > I am thinking that to make it more consistent, we should change the > attribute functions to > attr_name or node_name > attr_value or node_value > attr_specified or node_specified > > I'd vote for the latter series since the programmer already knows they're > attributes. Renaming will reduce the WTF factor. We can leave the aliases > to the old functions for a while to maintain BC. > > WISH: I wish there was a Zend Function for marking a function alias as > deprecated, I.e. so that a warning message is displayed if the function is > used after being marked deprecated. A way to display the replacement > function in the warning message would be nice too. > > Joseph > > > -- nam...christian stocker adr...bremgartnerstr. 66, ch-8003 zurich pho...+41 1 451 6021 www...http://phant.ch/chregu mob...+41 76 561 8860 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wor...+41 1 240 5670 gpg...0x5CE1DECB -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
