Thank you for doing this Michael, it clarified a few questions I had while highlighting a new concern:
Based on what I see the Member Projects of the FIG do not get to vote, though they can share their comments via the group. However, Member Projects are encouraged to implement these interoperability "standards" without said vote. (imposed "tax") Dramatic I know, but valid. I foresee a future full of squabbling and rejection to use PSRs because, "I didn't vote for it!" There would be no "ownership" of these new PSRs. I fully understand the working group would be composed of individuals that are best in a given field as subject experts, and who may have a more active role in the given technology. But again...ownership is key to ensure these interoperability recommendations are accepted by more projects. As such, I would suggest the addition of a "Member Projects Vote" after the "Review stage" but before the "Core Committee: Acceptance Vote". Make it a standard 2 week combined voting/feedback period to air out any unforeseen comments/concerns, where simple majority passes the motion. Then when the Core Committee accepts the PSR there will be much wider adoption and acceptance. Thoughts? Regards, Adam Culp IBMiToolkit On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 3:01:09 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > A vote for FIG 3.0 is [potentially/hopefully] getting closer and one big > thing people had been asking for is a TL;DR of FIG 3.0 to give an overview > of the new structure and processes. > > The last couple of days I've been working with Larry on compressing it > into 3 graphics and a post that, according to medium, takes 3 minutes or > less to read. I'd invite to you all to have a read of that version, and if > that wets your appetite for more, then of course I'd suggest you take a > read of the full bylaws (after all, that is what will actually be being > voted upon). > > I'd love to see some active discussion (or if you are just in general > agreement about it, some +1s) about this over the next couple of weeks as > discussion has been quite quiet on it over the last few weeks on the > mailing list; however what I've heard from people at conferences and > elsewhere has been a good positive reception. Assuming there are no major > objections and we don't end up making major changes we'd like to see this > going to a vote on the 17th August, to end on the 31st August. The CC > elections would then be able to take place in September. > > Without further comment, *the TL;DR of FIG 3.0: http://bit.ly/fig-3-0 > <http://bit.ly/fig-3-0>* > > Many thanks, > Michael & Larry > (Note: I am not posting this as a secretary but as a co-author of FIG 3.0 > in line with my declared conflict of interest) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/e179da6b-0e9c-4f72-813f-98d6add31156%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
