Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 12:26 -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
>   
>> Stut wrote:
>>     
>>> On 9 Nov 2008, at 18:14, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:00 +0000, Stut wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On 9 Nov 2008, at 07:16, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 20:26 -0800, bruce wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I've got a question/issue that I want to bounce off the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a list that extends over multiple pages. there might be 200
>>>>>>> items,
>>>>>>> and i don't want to have the items listed on the same page as it
>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>> too long. i can break the list up, so i can have it be displayed over
>>>>>>> multiple pages. however, i want the user to select different items
>>>>>>> from the
>>>>>>> list. given that the selected items might be over different pages,
>>>>>>> what's
>>>>>>> the best way of keeping a running track of the items that have been
>>>>>>> selected??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could have each page be a form, and do a post/get where i then
>>>>>>> keep track
>>>>>>> of the selected items from page to page, but that would appear to
>>>>>>> get ugly.
>>>>>>> i'm looking for pointers to other sites/code that might have already
>>>>>>> implemented this kind of scenario.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thoughts/pointers would be appreciated...
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Accumulate them in the session. When done, and before final action you
>>>>>> could let them view a summary of selected items and allow deletion of
>>>>>> any entries they don't want.
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Unless they're likely to select hundreds of items I'd either go with a
>>>>> persisted GET var or a cookie. No need to drag server-side storage
>>>>> into this.
>>>>>           
>>>> Well he did say he had multiple pages. Maybe he's only displaying 5 per
>>>> page though. Still, sessions are easier to manage than GET vars since
>>>> you don't need to append them to every form action URL to accumulate
>>>> them. Session is managed transparently by PHP in most cases an amounts
>>>> to the approximate overhead of an include.
>>>>         
>>> Seriously? You'd rather use sessions than explode, modify and implode
>>> an array of numbers on each request? You really see that as a valuable
>>> developer time-saver?
>>>
>>> The mind boggles, but as I've said before and probably will again it's
>>> always a personal choice, I'm just suggesting alternatives.
>>>
>>> -Stut
>>>
>>>       
>> Also, by storing the information server side, there is less of a chance
>> of the user tampering with the data.  Storing stuff in the session also
>> saves on network bandwidth of sending and retrieving the data with each
>> request.
>>     
>
> Nah, the problem is the same. Tamper with the GET data or tamper with
> the POST date before it goes into the session. Need to check the
> incoming data regardless.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
>   

Yes, but once it's in the session, it should be ok.

Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to