On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry <k...@kyleterry.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown <danbr...@php.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle >>>> <edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN, >>>>> webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5 >>>>> people. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. But if >>>>> >>>> there >>>> >>>>> are quite enough people interested, it would be indeed a good idea to >>>>> >>>> start >>>> >>>>> some other kind of communication... >>>>> >>>> I flat-out disagree with this, Ed. Nothing at all against you, >>>> though. >>>> >>>> This is the General list for PHP, and while this project is >>>> PHP-related (and "general" in nature), if we allow even the "regulars" >>>> to do so here, how can we then tell others that we won't allow them to >>>> discuss their PHP-related projects on this list? >>>> >>>> Putting the code on a proper system to begin with means no >>>> screwing around later when the project is running at full steam. >>>> And even if there are only four or five people working on it, if those >>>> folks put in a good effort, they can work wonders. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> </Daniel P. Brown> >>>> daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net >>>> http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ >>>> Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print - email me to find >>>> out! >>>> >>>> I work on a development team of 3; me and 2 others. 1 of which only >>> develops >>> about a quarter of his time here. Even with my co worker sitting next to >>> me, >>> if we weren't using a repo, we would both be at a complete loss (right >>> word?). >>> >>> -- >>> Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com >>> >>> >> I have been using svn for 3 years by myself. Recently I talked my >> other co workers to play with it and they love it. But even in an >> army of one it's amazing to be able to figure out what I messed up >> last week or why I decided to change something at 5:00. People have >> wrote books on it though, so I'll hush. >> > > still up :p > > dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any > extra needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows > discussion and document storage made website available] > svn - a must imho > > consideration: > been thinking 2 things > 1 - this could be a lot of noise on the list; perhaps an approach of rfc > and publish every idea, post link to it here so anybody can contribute, then > go from there. > discuss [ wiki needed? ] wiki will definitely be needed. > > 2 - actually that was both in one sentance > > maybe first rfc should be "super class for all xxxx (our) objects" and if > so what > > + a name, cos if we need to start prefixing.. and it can't be 4LC as can't > start with a number :p The world's object? > > > this will be massively interesting.. > -- Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com
