Gary wrote:
Thank you to everybody that replied...but it almost seems it is making extra
work.
I can understand using an include for a menu, since they tend to change
often and it is on every page, but the normal content I am not understanding
the benefit. If I have a page that has unique content on it, that is to say
no other page has this content, why would I want to create a separate file
to be included on the page, why would I not simple put the content directly
on the page itself?
There are several advantages of using include. I can't imagine an
application without include/require/autoload.
I create the database adapter only once per request. I store several
application configuration items in a config file and load this
configuration information only once per request. I have one layout for
the application. Only the content and the menus change. So, I would
simply include various sections of the web page in relevant positions.
Example:
layout.php
<?php
include 'header.php';
include 'menu.php'; // menu.php is also dynamic. menu.php determines
what to display on the current page.
include 'sidebar.php'; // within sidebar.php I would include
block_a.php, block_b.php, etc
include 'footer.php';
?>
I put the utility functions and classes in a library file. I would
simply include the library.php and use the functions available in it.
I hope you get the point of using include.
What is the best type of file to be used as an include (.txt, .php).
--
With warm regards,
Sudheer. S
Business: http://binaryvibes.co.in, Tech stuff: http://techchorus.net,
Personal: http://sudheer.net
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
