I do use FirePHP and your project looks interesting to evaluate. Will
check it out in a couple of days. It would be more interesting if they
really are complimentary.
I think people who use FireBug's console API would be able to appreciate
FirePHP/formaldehyde more. However, I do NOT deny the fact that not
every project needs them.
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
So nobody here debugs interaction and nobody uses Selenium for application
tests ... fair enough.
Would be nice to receive some response for those developers whose deal everyday
with big/complex applications, 'cause here seems nobody i susing FirePHP or
frameworks debuggers while numbers tell me the scenario is totally different.
Subject: RE: [PHP] RE: [Formaldehyde] The Most Basic Ajax - PHP Error Debugger
CC: an_...@hotmail.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:39:12 +0100
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:35 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 3:27 PM +0200 9/11/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
That's a finished production site ... how did you debug during its
development? 'Cause Formaldehyde is for development, not for
production ... I guess you have implented your own error
What's to debug?
The site --
-- uses a very simple ajax script, namely:
Outside of that, everything else is done in php, html, and css, which
is completely separate from ajax. I can create a very extensive and
complicated site using that simple ajax routine without any
alteration whatsoever. I don't need a debugger because I never touch
Now maybe I'm not getting it, but from my perspective ajax is pretty
simple. The point I'm getting at is that ajax is simply a method of
communication -- you send stuff and you read stuff. You don't need to
rewrite the US Postal Service every time you send/receive a letter.
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
I agree. I tend to reuse the same basic functionality whenever I use
parts easily enough.
Share your memories online with anyone you want.