On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
> Rene Veerman wrote:
>> popular : facebook youtube etc
> Rene, I must be missing something here.  That sort of size implies
> millions in advertising revenue, so why are we discussing how much
> performance we can squeeze out of a single box?  I mean, I'm all for
> efficient use of system resources, but if I have a semi-scalable
> application, it's a lot easier just getting another box than trying to
> change the implementation language.  OTOH, if my design is not
> scalable, it's probably also easier to redo it than trying to change
> the implementation language.

a) you're determining the contents of my toolset, without it affecting
you at all. the way you want it php will degrade into a toy language.
b) i will aim for all possible decreases in development time and
operating costs during, not only in the grow phase but also in hard
economic times. any business person knows why.

>> and you're still trying to impose a toolset on me.
> I didn't think I was - you're the one who seem to be fixed on PHP as the
> only solution, and advocating that it be enhanced to suit your
> purposes.

no, php is just my toolset of choice, and i think it should grow with
the times and support threading and shared memory.
maybe even a few cool features to enable use-as-a-cloud.

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to