In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Kimsal wrote:

>>>Someone seems to have started this, although I'm not sure why he's not
>>>going more object-based.
>>>I would prefer something like
>>>$i = new Imagick();
>>>instead of
>>>$i= imagick_create();
>> it's open source. just do it more object orientated ... and i'm sure
>> the author (me...) will be very happy to impelement it ;)
>> honestly, OO-Interface was and still is planned, but i think more
>> functionality is  much more needed at the moment than an oo interface.
>> it was my first extension, so i wanted to keep it simple for the
>> beginning.
>> but if someone else likes to implement it earlier, i'm the last, who
>> has a problem with that (and don't expect 00 soon from me ...)
>> chregu
> Hello -
> Please don't take my comment the wrong way - I know what I'd *like* to

no, didn't take it the wrong way. maybe my answer was a bit to harsh ;)

> see (which is how I labelled it above) and what I'm capable of actually
> contributing.
> Doing C-code PHP extensions is beyond my capabilities, so I make do with
> what others contribute.  Simply because something is opensource doesn't
> mean everyone has equal talent to add in actual code.  :(
> I thank you for your contribution of this code so far, and should you
> continue to work on it in whatever fashion you choose, so much the
> better.  It is appreciated, OO or not (it would just be appreciated more
> if it was OO.)  :)

i would it appreciate as well, if it was OO. I was just not capable back
then to do it OO, maybe i am the next time I invest more time in it.


PHP General Mailing List (
To unsubscribe, visit:

Reply via email to