The bug :
http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=8690
is no more in status "Open" for a lack of information !!!

What can we do better than giving you the code, the XSD and the error
message ???
According to the bug submission, I wasn't the only one constating this
problem.

Can you reopen it ? Simon your feelings ?

Thx

WFX

On 11 avr, 15:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 11 Apr, 10:59, "WFX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hum, I tried my link, it's working (again ?) now ...
>
> > Anyway, I uploaded all the XSD package here 
> > :http://depotnet.free.fr/DDEX_XSD_20061017.zip
> > It seems that SDO doesn't like ComplexType or something like that.
> > I don't know if it may be related to bug described here 
> > :http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=8690
>
> > WFX
>
> > On 10 avr, 17:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > On 10 Apr, 14:52, "WFX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi all !
>
> > > > I found ths extension very usefull. I tried to use it with the
> > > > following code :
>
> > > > <?php
> > > > try {
> > > >    $xmldas = SDO_DAS_XML::create("./ddex_xsd/dsr.xsd");
> > > >   print($xmldas);} catch (SDO_Exception $e) {
>
> > > >    print($e->getMessage());}
>
> > > > ?>
>
> > > > but I get this execption :
> > > > Cannot add property Namespace of type commonj.sdo#String to this data
> > > > typehttp://ddex.net/xml/2006/dsrm/10#CommercialModelType
>
> > > > xsd file can be downloaded here 
> > > > :http://ddex.net/xml/2006/dsrm/10/dsr.xsd
>
> > > > Is it a bug in this SDO release ?
>
> > > > Thanks
>
> > > > WFX
>
> > > Hi there. Thanks for trying SDO. I tried to go and look at the schema
> > > at the link you provided and I couldn't get to the server. If I google
> > > up ddex it definitely thinks there should be awww.ddex.netbutI
> > > can't ping it at the moment. Is it down?
>
> > > Regards
>
> > > Simon- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -
>
> > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
>
> Hi, don't know what went wrong yesterday but I can see your schema
> now. This looks like the same problem from the bug report that you
> reference, i.e. SDO doesn't seem to handle simple types which are
> extensions (or restrictions) from complex types. I note that this is
> pretty old and clearly nothing has been done about it. Sorry about
> that. I took a quick look at the code and the error you are getting is
> raised when the infrastructure tries to add a new property (attribute
> in your case) to a simple type which in SDO can't have properties.
> This is an issue in the SDO implementation from Apache Tuscany that we
> use so I will have to investigate further. I expect a special trap
> will be needed to test for the case where simple type extends a
> complex type and in this case create the type as a data object instead
> of a data type.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to