thanks for putting this up here and saving us all falling over it. I
expect this is related to the answer I got back on
which is all about namespaces, and where I know a fix was checked in
recently (a week or so ago, after I took the code for DUNLIN). I
expected when I read the answer on the JIRA that there might be
problems because the answer was telling me something I did not agree
with about what element should be on what namespace. But I know it's
going to need a bit of time for me to load my head up with the rules
about namespaces and answer the JIRA again. I think I had XERCES on my
side when I raised the JIRA in the first place, as it happens.

Anyway, I think there is a chance that the recent namespace change in
the Tuscany code (leaving aside the fact that tns2 is not defined as a
namespace prefix) is wrong, so I suggest that you do not check it in.
I will look at the JIRA and answer it for sure in the next two days,
and also reply back here with what I find.


On Jun 25, 1:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Needs more investigation but I thought I would post this in case
> someone else embarks on the same piece of work.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to