On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
> >>
> >>> is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
> >>> <documentation></documentation> in the WSDL based on the method's
> >>> description in the doc block?
> >> Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
> volunteers?
> >>
> >
> > I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my
> spare
> > time.
> >
> > I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going
> to
> > do this.
> > Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put
> > here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you
> guys
> > handle these things).
> >
> > Anyway, I am a volunteer :)
> >
> > Silvano
> >
> Great :-)
> Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
> http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have
> a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.
>
>
Ok I just did it: http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775

Need your thoughts here.

1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in the
request above), or only for methods?
2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle this?

Silvano

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to