On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Silvano Girardi Jr wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote: > >> > >>> is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the > >>> <documentation></documentation> in the WSDL based on the method's > >>> description in the doc block? > >> Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any > volunteers? > >> > > > > I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my > spare > > time. > > > > I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going > to > > do this. > > Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put > > here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you > guys > > handle these things). > > > > Anyway, I am a volunteer :) > > > > Silvano > > > Great :-) > Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at > http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have > a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it. > > Ok I just did it: http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775 Need your thoughts here. 1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in the request above), or only for methods? 2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle this? Silvano --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
