Hi Silvano,

There's a text document called "CLA" in the distirbution (see
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/sdo/CLA?revision=1.2&view=markup&pathrev=MAIN).
It describes what you need to do.  If you have any questions or
concerns, please let me know.

Regards, Graham.

On 2 Jun, 16:53, "Silvano Girardi Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> I have that interest. Where do I start? :)
>
> Thanks
> Silvano
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Silvano,
>
> > Sorry for not replying sooner and not replying to your original note.
> > I always had in mind to generate documentation in the WSDL from the
> > methods descriptions, so what you have done is exactly the right idea.
>
> > Thanks also for the patch.  I haven't taken a look at the moment.  The
> > SCA_SDO project has a CLA to cover contributions and so far as I'm
> > aware you've not signed, or been asked to sign it.  Is this something
> > you'd be willing and able to do?  I can give you more information in
> > needed.
>
> > Regards, Graham.
>
> > On 30 May, 17:05, "Silvano Girardi Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since I got no comments, I made it only for methods and not optional.
>
> > > I've put the patch in the case.
>
> > > Silvano
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Silvano Girardi Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > >> >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
>
> > > >> >>> is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
> > > >> >>> <documentation></documentation> in the WSDL based on the method's
> > > >> >>> description in the doc block?
> > > >> >> Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
> > > >> volunteers?
>
> > > >> > I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in
> > my
> > > >> spare
> > > >> > time.
>
> > > >> > I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are
> > going
> > > >> to
> > > >> > do this.
> > > >> > Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can
> > put
> > > >> > here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how
> > you
> > > >> guys
> > > >> > handle these things).
>
> > > >> > Anyway, I am a volunteer :)
>
> > > >> > Silvano
>
> > > >> Great :-)
> > > >> Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
> > > >>http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you
> > have
> > > >> a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.
>
> > > > Ok I just did it:http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775
>
> > > > Need your thoughts here.
>
> > > > 1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in
> > the
> > > > request above), or only for methods?
> > > > 2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle
> > > > this?
>
> > > > Silvano
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to