Nice shot ! That's it... succeful compilation ;-) I hope i can get good price for the "thanks" word, as i have to buy you a thousand of these !
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de>wrote: > Hi Renaud, > > > Hi Alex, and thanks for your answer... > > No problem. I'm glad for your input. > > > > -ldl is present in the Makefile, and also in the "complaining" invocation > of > > gcc : > > gcc -m64 -rdynamic -lc -lm -ldl -o ../bin/picolisp x86-64.linux.base.o > > Hmm, looking at that, it occurs to me that the order of arguments to > 'gcc' might be relevant: If it first processes "-ldl", and _then_ > "x86-64.linux.base.o", it might be too late to detect that certain > functions from the library are needed. > > But if so, why did it work under Debian? > > > Anyway, could you help me with a test? Change in Makefile > > 1. The line in the "Linux" condition > > LD-MAIN = gcc -m64 -rdynamic -lc -lm -ldl > > to > > LD-MAIN = -m64 -rdynamic -lc -lm -ldl > > > 2. The line in the "$(bin)/picolisp:" target > > $(LD-MAIN) -o $(bin)/picolisp $(ARCH).$(SYS).base.o > > to > > gcc -o $(bin)/picolisp $(ARCH).$(SYS).base.o $(LD-MAIN) > > > If it works with these changes, then we must also fix the corresponding > LD-SHARED lines. > > Cheers, > - Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe > -- Renaud GOMBERT -- 09 70 44 89 44 a-noter.net : une page pour vous dire