On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hmm, looking at that, it occurs to me that the order of arguments to
> 'gcc' might be relevant: If it first processes "-ldl", and _then_
> "x86-64.linux.base.o", it might be too late to detect that certain
> functions from the library are needed.
> But if so, why did it work under Debian?

It seems different versions of GCC, or installations of it, behave
differently. I have been bitten by this problem many times.
There is one correct order, but the incorrect order works on many
GCC versions.


UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to