On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Hmm, looking at that, it occurs to me that the order of arguments to > 'gcc' might be relevant: If it first processes "-ldl", and _then_ > "x86-64.linux.base.o", it might be too late to detect that certain > functions from the library are needed. > > But if so, why did it work under Debian?
It seems different versions of GCC, or installations of it, behave differently. I have been bitten by this problem many times. There is one correct order, but the incorrect order works on many GCC versions. //Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
