If they target .NET I mean, I've heard you can get acceptable results on
that stack so some respect is due to those people.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Henrik Sarvell <hsarv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm sorry to have to say this but these people are only "real" programmers
> if they don't target the MS stack with .NET etc, the whole WAMP, XAMPP posse
> are just hobbyists and not a iota of energy should be spent to make their
> lives easier.
>
> They have to suffer, as much as possible.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Jakob Eriksson <ja...@vmlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:30:58AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> >
>> > Sure, if you consider the sheer number of installations and users.
>> >
>> > When talking about "interesting segments", I meant that the major
>> > battlefields these days are either in the smartphones and tablet area,
>> > with server (cloud) systems, or - traditionally (also in terms of sheer
>> > numbers), but largely unnoticed by the consumer - embedded systems. The
>> > desktop is losing importance.
>> >
>> > Especially for embedded systems PicoLisp might still have unexplored
>> > potential (right, Jakob?), but also for distributed databases.
>>
>> I agree except that MANY who target Linux in web installations use
>> Windows on their desktop. They are used to able to run Apache, PHP,
>> Perl, Python stacks on the Windows desktops and then push that code
>> to the Linux servers.
>>
>> So I think PicoLisp on Windows could easily double PicoLisp userbase,
>> probably more.
>> +1 on embedded, especially MiniPicolisp.
>>
>>
>> //Jakob
>>
>> --
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
>>
>
>

Reply via email to