I'll have to review my notes and see where I was on that. After some initial successes compiling, after testing more, I remember some snags in either mini picolisp or full picolisp involving some ARM vs x86 differences.
--- On Tue, 10/9/12, Thorsten Jolitz <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Thorsten Jolitz <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Android Demo > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2012, 10:06 AM > Doug Snead <[email protected]> > writes: > > Hi Joe and Doug, > > I read up your conversations about PicoLisp on Android in > the mailing > list and your articles in the Wiki about the topic: > > > Ok, so now this means we can package some picolisp > client/server > > applications as android apps, using the android > browser. (I think.) I > > like that approach because it works with the android > browser and app > > packaging scheme - and at the same time you're getting > picolisp in all > > its glory and efficiency. > > I don't have an Android device to try out your code > examples, but I > would be interested in the 'status quo' of this topic - is > full PicoLisp > running on Android, have there been any real Apps > implemented in > PicoLisp by somebody? > > If so - are there any cons of using PicoLisp instead of Java > to be > considered? > > -- > cheers, > Thorsten > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe > -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
