I'll have to review my notes and see where I was on that. After some initial 
successes compiling, after testing more, I remember some snags in either mini 
picolisp or full picolisp involving some ARM vs x86 differences.   




--- On Tue, 10/9/12, Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> From: Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: Android Demo
> To: picolisp@software-lab.de
> Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2012, 10:06 AM
> Doug Snead <semaphore_2...@yahoo.com>
> writes:
> 
> Hi Joe and Doug,
> 
> I read up your conversations about PicoLisp on Android in
> the mailing
> list and your articles in the Wiki about the topic:
> 
> > Ok, so now this means we can package some picolisp
> client/server
> > applications as android apps, using the android
> browser. (I think.) I
> > like that approach because it works with the android
> browser and app
> > packaging scheme - and at the same time you're getting
> picolisp in all
> > its glory and efficiency.
> 
> I don't have an Android device to try out your code
> examples, but I
> would be interested in the 'status quo' of this topic - is
> full PicoLisp
> running on Android, have there been any real Apps
> implemented in
> PicoLisp by somebody?
> 
> If so - are there any cons of using PicoLisp instead of Java
> to be
> considered? 
> 
> -- 
> cheers,
> Thorsten
> 
> -- 
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
> 
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to