Hi Jon,

> >          next = Env.Next;  Env.Next = 0;
> >
> > So here 'next' is used.
> Not really. A value (from Env.Next) is stored in 'next', but that value is
> never retrieved from 'next' later. Therefor 'next' is considered useless.

Ah! Cool! That's the problem.

'next' is indeed necessary, and the above assignment is correct. The bug
is that this *retrieval* somehow got lost, so nested function calls with
variable arguments (i.e. the '@' mechanism) will unnest properly.

This bug can be produced by nesting two vararg-functions:

   (de f @
      (g 1 2)
      (println (next)) )

   (de g @
      (println (next)) )

   (f 3)

PicoLisp correctly prints 1 and 3, but Ersatz gives a
NullPointerException because 'Env.Next' is never restored when 'g'

I'll fix that. Thanks!

♪♫ Alex
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to