I too was looking into creating an FPGA implementation of picolisp and am
very excited about this.  A developer board which already runs Linux but
also has an FPGA onboard may be worth exploring.  Like this one:

Perhaps the picolisp chip could offload calculations to the 16 core
coprocessor for calculation intensive applications.  In any case this is
very exciting for many reasons and I'm happy to test and help however I
can.  Great work.
On Sep 19, 2014 11:20 AM, "Rowan Thorpe" <ro...@rowanthorpe.com> wrote:

> On Fri 19 Sep 2014 15:47, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> > On September 19, 2014 at 3:18 PM Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This might be off base, but is it within the realm of possibility to
> > > run PilMCU on a raspberry pi now or in the future? That's an accessible
> > > piece of hardware that many people already have (myself included).
> These
> > > people may also be willing to fund the work
> >
> > Raspi runs linux, so you can run PicoLisp on it right now. PilMCU is
> about
> > new hardware chips.
> > You could of course go the middle way, that could attract some attention:
> > port PicoLisp to bare Raspberry Pi hardware. Also an interesting
> prospect.
> > But the ARM cpu in the pi is not a natural fit, it is not 64 bit, only
> 32.
> > So it would be more of a promo thing. But very cool in its own right.
> Strange this came up just now - I am a long-time stalker on the mailing
> list,
> and had been brewing the idea for a long time to get the ball rolling for a
> Picolisp equivalent of this:
>  http://common-lisp.net/project/movitz/movitz.html
> and ultimately perhaps one day a picolisp-based kernel, and maybe even a
> predominantly picolisp-OS (...I like to dream big).
> I am for sure much more excited about this latest picolisp-machine
> announcement
> though (LISP machines are back! Their time has come! Mwahahahaha!), but
> there
> is probably still a good reason to also go the "middle way" too, for the
> reasons already mentioned - to gain attention and to do meaningful
> performance
> comparisons to existing software.
> FWIW: I am totally up for contributing to PilMCU, RasPicolisp or
> Picolix86_64p
>       in any way that I can. Count me in.
> --
> Rowan Thorpe
> PGP fingerprint:
>  BB0A 0787 C0EE BDD8 7F97  3D30 49F2 13A5 265D CCBD
> ----
> "There is a great difference between worry and concern. A worried person
> sees
> a problem, and a concerned person solves a problem."
>  - Harold Stephens
> --
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to