On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:59:00PM +0200, Christophe Gragnic wrote: > > Is it really so important that the random generators give the same > > results? > > Not so much important indeed, not crucial, but very interesting! > > > I had never intended that. The reason is that the random generator > > should be as simple (fast) as possible, > > Let's sum up what we have now concerning pil32 and ersatz:
The problem is that you focus too much on pil32. I regard pil32 as obsolete! The "standard" system for reference is pil64. And for small systems, miniPicoLisp makes a lot of sense. There are, and will always be, a lot of differences between those systems. > And pilMCU ? Ha ha, I'm just curious ! That's identical to pil64 in this regard :) ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
