On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > > The problem is that you focus too much on pil32. I regard pil32 as > obsolete! The "standard" system for reference is pil64.
Ouch. I thought about asking you this question concerning pil32, but maybe I didn't want to hear the answer I already guessed. > And for small systems, miniPicoLisp makes a lot of sense. > > There are, and will always be, a lot of differences between those > systems. OK (surrendering). Thanks for your patience, and sorry for the fuss. I'll try to implement something like MINSTD, where a*(m-1)<2^53. >> And pilMCU ? Ha ha, I'm just curious ! > > That's identical to pil64 in this regard :) Maybe I should look into emu64 now. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, George Orais <gpor...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Chris and Alex, > > Just for curiosity, here is the result from pilMCU and Picolisp: > > […] > > And Alex is right, it is all identical to pil64 ;) Thanks for taking the time to report this. chri -- http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site pro) http://delicious.com/profgraorg (liens, favoris) https://twitter.com/profgraorg http://microalg.info -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
