After installing WSL I'm going to install/make PicoLisp.

I guess I now should use the default installation steps here:
https://picolisp.com/wiki/?home

> ​Otherwise, grab the latest version - [picoLisp.tgz] - unpack it,
>
follow the instructions from the INSTALL file, and then check out the
> tutorial.​
>

But on this page: http://www.picolisp.com/wiki/?flinuxpicolisp it says:

>
>    - patch the Makefile
>
>
>    - patch tab.c
>
>
>    - (optional) patch net.c​
>
> Do I need those patches even when using WSL???

/Arie



2018-04-16 18:33 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden <xapw...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Joe,
>
> ok. I'll try WSL then.
> Will let know about my findings.
> Maybe others can profit as well (Philip?)
>
> Thx
> /Arie
>
> Op ma 16 apr. 2018 18:10 schreef Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Arie,
>>
>> I would like to send a more detailed reply later. I'm the author of the
>> flinux writeup. It's been a few years and things don't work as nicely as
>> they did back then.
>>
>> I retested some the writeup today. I was unable to get the flinux static
>> option working. I was able to get flinux dynamic working, but the archlinux
>> distro is out of date and I wouldn't recommend going down that path any
>> more.
>>
>> After the flinux experiment, I did do some work with a precusor to WSL,
>> midipix[1], which seems to still work.
>>
>> The last time I tried WSL it had issues with database locking. I need to
>> do some more experiments on WSL now that I have a Win-10 machine
>>
>> I have another option that I've used over the years, midipix, but it's
>> out of date as well.
>>
>> Your best bet is probably to go with WSL or cygwin/msys for now.
>>
>> When I first put all this together, there was little interest. It sounds
>> like there is more interest now so I'll see if I can dust it off and bring
>> it up to date
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Philipp Geyer <phil...@geyer.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Based on the instructions on the site, it looks like the next steps are
>>> to build pil on Linux, and then run the linux binary on Windows through
>>> flinux.
>>>
>>> I have not tried pil in WSL yet (my only Windows text machine is Win7),
>>> and I don't think that's a solution for my specific problem (to have a
>>> simple environment for an end user with no technical experience) but I
>>> have had some luck building pil with mingw/msys which provide a POSIX
>>> compatibility layer on top of Windows. I have not (yet) managed to get
>>> anything 100% working, but I'm optimistic. Currently if I build with
>>> msys2, I can get an executable which I believe passed the tests, but
>>> requires msys2.dll to be in the library path (which includes the
>>> executable directory of course) but I believe that if you build with
>>> mingw without msys, it builds against msvcrt directly, and links in the
>>> compatibility layer. This is what I haven't managed yet.
>>>
>>> As I said though, I'm optimistic, and it's something I need for my
>>> project.
>>>
>>> Philipp Geyer/Nistur
>>>
>>> --
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to