On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...Hopefully the final candidate. > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/ > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/> > > Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28....
The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key (0x06687D96) used to sign the release, could you add it to a KEYS file under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS for an example. Uploading that key to public key servers like pgp.mit.edu as well would be good. Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked: md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz matches md5 file. LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me. The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me. Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an AL license header. I would suggest attaching the rat report to a JIRA issue in case Incubator people ask about it. And there's a number of test *.pig files that do not have the AL header, if the pig language allows comments (I hope it does ;-) it might be good to add that for future releases. I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig from that release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but not user" point of view. -Bertrand
