Hi, On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...The keys are at > /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig/KEYS on people.apache.org....
Ok thanks, with this I give my +1 to this release. -Bertrand > > I will attach rat the report to release JIRA. > > Olga > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz >> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:06 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3) >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > ...Hopefully the final candidate. >> > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/ >> > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/> >> > >> > Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.... >> >> The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key >> (0x06687D96) used to sign the release, could you add it to a >> KEYS file under >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS >> for an example. Uploading that key to public key servers like >> pgp.mit.edu as well would be good. >> >> Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked: >> >> md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz >> matches md5 file. >> >> LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me. >> >> The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me. >> >> Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an >> AL license header. I would suggest attaching the rat report >> to a JIRA issue in case Incubator people ask about it. And >> there's a number of test *.pig files that do not have the AL >> header, if the pig language allows comments (I hope it does >> ;-) it might be good to add that for future releases. >> >> I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig >> from that release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but >> not user" point of view. >> >> -Bertrand >> >
