Hi Torsten, Let me ask the question a different way - are you ok +1 this release or do you feel that release instructions and hadoop cleanup needs to happen first.
Re-rolling packages is not a problem but getting everybody's attention proved to be fairly time consuming. Thanks, Olga > -----Original Message----- > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3) > > > On Jul 29, 2008, at 00:23, Olga Natkovich wrote: > > >> Well, the idea of incubation is to gather a community (besides the > >> legal aspect). I would suggest to at least provide more detailed > >> instruction how to get the things working in the wiki. Or > did I miss > >> those? > > > > I was going to put instructions into the release notes once the > > release is ready. > > IMO this should be part of the release process so the > instructions can be tested as well. > > >>>> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included? > >>> > >>> The idea was that people can build with 1 version back. > >> > >> That sounds like a good idea ..at least in theory :) > >> > >>> However, at this > >>> point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change > >> between each > >>> version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do > >> this cleanup > >>> prior to the release? > >> > >> It's a bit awkward to have 0.16 in there if you cannot use > it at all. > > > > Ok. It just if we have to reroll the packages and start > process over > > one more time. I was wondering if this was worth starting over. > > That's really up to you guys. If you have the release > procedure properly automated I'd say: do it. > > >> (That said I was about to send a question to the dev list > about using > >> 0.16 with pig. I need to get it working with 0.16. Will that be a > >> major hurdle? But let's discuss that in another thread) > > > > It is possible, but you would have to take pre hadoop-17 > snapshot of > > the code. It is quite stable but you would be missing out > on the work > > that has been done since. > > > Bugger I was hoping to see a tag for it. Which revision would that be? > > cheers > -- > Torsten > >
