Hi Bertrand, Thanks for the review. The keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig/KEYS on people.apache.org.
I will attach rat the report to release JIRA. Olga > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3) > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...Hopefully the final candidate. > > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/ > > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/> > > > > Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.... > > The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key > (0x06687D96) used to sign the release, could you add it to a > KEYS file under > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS > for an example. Uploading that key to public key servers like > pgp.mit.edu as well would be good. > > Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked: > > md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz > matches md5 file. > > LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me. > > The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me. > > Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an > AL license header. I would suggest attaching the rat report > to a JIRA issue in case Incubator people ask about it. And > there's a number of test *.pig files that do not have the AL > header, if the pig language allows comments (I hope it does > ;-) it might be good to add that for future releases. > > I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig > from that release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but > not user" point of view. > > -Bertrand >
