Hello all , I am currently on this , Please Janos , make your decision.
Since I have looking at your project for very long time , And my client begin to ask for. It is very simple to implenent , because there is simple convertor from regular file system to S3. If you decided not to , please let us all know. In this case I will need to implement it by my self by the near future. I have a lot of respect to your project and your time and the willing to get pay for it. But if some one whould like to pay , is for the support not for feature. Please take a look on the proxmox project. By my self , and my clients , I do not mean to take off without S3. Please let us all know what have you decide. Thak you all for your support and your time. הורד את TypeApp עבור Android ב-6 באפר׳ 2020, 1:47, ב-Ryan Blenis <ryan.ble...@gmail.com>, 1:47 כתב: >Hi Janos, > >Thank you as always for your quick and in-depth response. I certainly >understand the delicate balance between FOSS and enterprise paywalls >and >feature-sets, and I thank you for even having an open source option to >begin with! I'm just planning a migration to a new server (for when my >current OS is EOL) and wanted to move the hosting to one with better >support that doesn't over-provision the hosts resources as I've seen on >the >current host, but HDD space isn't anywhere near as inexpensive as it is >at >the current company. I was just thinking I could have the best of both >worlds with S3 storage integrated. Many of the FOSS/enterprise paywalls >in >other projects are based on LDAP integration, multi-tenancy, >pre-packages >binaries, support levels, etc. that many business need, whereas object >storage vs block storage felt like more of a separate paywall in terms >of >cloud providers, so I just figured I'd ask if it was coming to the FOSS >version. Also, I like to be able to modify the code if a customization >can >be made, which I assume would not be the case with enterprise, correct? > >Also, if I try the enterprise on the new host, is there a path to >downgrade >to the FOSS version? Or would starting back from scratch be the only >option? > >Thank you as always again. > >On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 7:16 AM <s...@acts.hu> wrote: > >> >> Hello Ryan, >> >> On 2020-04-05 10:55, Ryan Blenis wrote: >> > >> > I see the enterprise version you offer it says one of the features >> > piler has is S3 object storage, which looks like it was originally >> > requested on the mailing list in 2018: >> > https://firstname.lastname@example.org/msg01335.html >> > >> > Does this mean that it is fully implemented now? And if so, will we >> >> yes, it's fully implemented by now. >> >> >> > ever see this in the open source version? Given the lower prices on >S3 >> > compatible storage versus block storage and the unchanging nature >of >> > the files, this would be great to have as an option that can reduce >> > hosting costs from what is now being used for [comparatively] >> > expensive block storage. >> >> >> well, I've been thinking about it for a while, and still not decided, >> it's a difficult business decision, so let me share my current >position >> on the matter. >> >> TL;DR: not in the near future. >> >> I'm really proud that the open source edition has gained a pretty >nice >> traction, and I decided to somehow monetize its popularity. >> >> So I've forked piler and built an enterprise edition along with some >> commercial >> services. To make the enterprise edition successful, I must offer >some >> features >> that are worth to pay for that is not available for free in the open >> source edition. >> >> I believe that the S3 storage support you asked for is such an >> attractive feature, >> so I'll keep it for the enterprise edition only, not sure how long. >> >> However, I'm well aware of that the S3 costs are significantly lower >> than block >> storage costs at cloud hosting companies. I encourage you to try the >> enterprise >> edition, and see if it works for you. If so, and you like it, then >> perhaps we >> could figure out something viable to make the transition from open >> source to >> enterprise. I'd like to emphasize that I don't want to force you in >this >> direction, >> and it's totally ok to decline. >> >> Let me know what you (and other piler users as well) think about the >> matter. >> >> Janos >> -- test text sig