[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In some places you're dropping usr/openwin (and subdirs) and in some places >> you're excluding them. Is there a rationale behind which is which? >> Typically "exclude" is used when a pathname needs not to be imported from >> the svr4 package because it's going to be reintroduced by some other >> package (either svr4 or ips). Doing the "drop" will eliminate the path >> entirely, though if you end up publishing the packages in just the right >> order, you can get away with it. Seems like you'd want to drop everything >> below usr/openwin, and exclude usr/openwin every time you see it, except >> for the one place you introduce it as a link. >> >> I could be wrong, of course. solaris.py is a piece of magic that seems to >> have taken on a life of its own. :) >> >> Other than that, a cursory examination doesn't reveal anything that an >> import wouldn't. Someone needs to test this before it goes back, though. > > My apologies for the delay in getting this out but hopefully better > late than never... > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-233/ >
SUNWxwfsw.86 -I would have expected to keep the "not" and "not yet confirmed" lists separate. Otherwise all looked OK. Dave _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
