On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 06:12:56PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > What should be the package name?
Tere's no good place in Rich's current hierarchy to put it. The best, quite frankly, seems to be in text/. It's not really an "office" application, not least because it doesn't let you edit anything (though would Acrobat itself go there? still probably not). Ultimately, it's more like, say, xdvi, which probably would go under text, along with other TeX tools, so "text/acroread". I'd say "doc/acroread", except that "doc" really implies the documentation itself, rather than documentation tools and viewers. > What classification? In the same vein, I guess I'd go with "System/Text Tools", but I'm not really happier with that. Freedesktop.org's classification implies that they'd put it in Office/Viewer. Ubuntu puts it in "Apps/Viewers" > How do people want the various language packages named? Until we get facets, "<package name>/locale/<locale name>". Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
