* Danek Duvall <[email protected]> [2009-04-02 02:03]: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 06:12:56PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > > > What should be the package name? > > Tere's no good place in Rich's current hierarchy to put it. The best, > quite frankly, seems to be in text/. It's not really an "office" > application, not least because it doesn't let you edit anything (though > would Acrobat itself go there? still probably not). > > Ultimately, it's more like, say, xdvi, which probably would go under text, > along with other TeX tools, so "text/acroread". I'd say "doc/acroread", > except that "doc" really implies the documentation itself, rather than > documentation tools and viewers.
viewer/acroread seems reasonable to me. As would viewer/xdvi, viewer/xpdf, etc. - Stephen -- [email protected] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
