Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Danek Duvall <[email protected]> [2009-04-02 02:03]:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 06:12:56PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
What should be the package name?
Tere's no good place in Rich's current hierarchy to put it. The best,
quite frankly, seems to be in text/. It's not really an "office"
application, not least because it doesn't let you edit anything (though
would Acrobat itself go there? still probably not).
Ultimately, it's more like, say, xdvi, which probably would go under text,
along with other TeX tools, so "text/acroread". I'd say "doc/acroread",
except that "doc" really implies the documentation itself, rather than
documentation tools and viewers.
viewer/acroread seems reasonable to me. As would viewer/xdvi,
viewer/xpdf, etc.
There you go. You'd think after all these years, I would have
learned to read all my email before responding.
I'd go with what Stephen suggests. And I like the first one best.
Now the next part (for me I guess) is deciding what other
things should now go under the new "viewer" section of the
new naming hierarchy.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
