George Vasick wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
Danek Duvall wrote:
Oh fun! So how about:
developer/gnu/gcc-432
developer/gnu/gcc-runtime-432
I'm not sure we want to put "gnu" in as a name component any more
than we
would want to put "sun". Perhaps developer/c/gcc*?
If we go with that, what should the currently proposed name of
developer/gnu/gcc-dev-4 be? Maybe just
developer/gcc-dev-4
?
I should also mention that these packages also provide Gnu C++,
Gnu Fortran and Gnu Objective C.
Just a quick note, gcc is an overloaded term. In the context of a
package like gcc 432, gcc means Gnu Compiler Collection, not to be
confused with the /usr/bin/gcc command itself.
Okay. So how about:
developer/gcc/gcc-dev-4
developer/gcc/gcc-432
developer/gcc/gcc-runtime-432
or just
developer/gcc-dev-4
developer/gcc-432
developer/gcc-runtime-432
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
