Hi all, On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 11:06 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: <snip> > > I believe Bart has mentioned to me before that a package doesn't have > > to declare its variants. Certainly, I don't believe the solver cares > > in this scenario. > > Indeed; Bart confirmed that having the variant.arch set action is > unnecessary; the merge program will add them in for us. So for > consistency, I'll pull them out entirely, unless someone can think > of a good reason to have them in.
Ok, I can remove that check, but it was one that was called out in the list of checks for pkglint - 13. Variants ------------ * if variant tags present, matching variant descriptions exist and are correctly specified * All packages contain a variant.arch tag I can drop these if needs be, but would just like to double-check that it's not needed. This particular entry in the list of pkglint checks came from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13536 perhaps I've misinterpreted it? cheers, tim _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
