On 07/19/10 04:00 PM, Tim Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 15:21 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
Tim Foster wrote:
I can drop these if needs be, but would just like to double-check that
it's not needed. This particular entry in the list of pkglint checks
came from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13536
perhaps I've misinterpreted it?
I believe that the requirement was for a published package, not for a
source manifest that had yet to be processed.
Aah, I see. pkglint at the moment just deals with Manifest objects, and
doesn't yet distinguish between published and unpublished manifests.
I could check whether a manifest was published by either looking for
timestamps on the pkg.fmri or a chash on any actions that delivered
content. I could alternatively check whether I've got a CachedManifest
rather than a base Manifest object - both sound a bit hacky though :-/
I don't think you can automatically detect this -- I think the user has
to tell you whether to perform published or unpublished checks.
Cheers,
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
