On 09/23/10 11:11 AM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/pkg-2775-v1-v2/
client.py:
- line 1521: I don't think this does what you want: "*" is always True.
Thanks for spotting that.
Are you treating "*...@*" specially because it's currently the only other
valid way of specifying all packages?
Yes.
I'm thinking we'll have to figure out the future of the up-to-date
check. It's not clear to me that we should do it just when updating
all packages, but not in any other situations. Not for this wad,
though.
Agree; I opted to punt on it since an update of specific packages is the
same as the install path essentially so we already have a point of
concern here today.
pkg.1.txt:
- line 265: speaking of which, do we ever define what the "client up to
date check" is anywhere?
No, but I figured what I put there is slightly more informative than
what we had.
I've resolved everything else; thanks!
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
