Tim Foster wrote:

> I didn't know we were keeping track - there have been several changes to
> this file since 2008.  I'm inclined to leave it at 2008 (which one could
> view as a declaration that the items after the colon are formatted as
> <section>/<cateory>)

I think the date refers to the scheme, and not the actual names,  Maybe we
bump the year if we change the names in an incompatible way, but I think
for this change, we can leave it alone.

> If you'd prefer I start using a 2011 prefix, I can certainly do that
> (pkglint I think is the only thing that enforces the year, perhaps
> wrongly?)

Pkglint should definitely keep doing the checks -- people have been
incorrectly putting in the current year just because it's the current year.

Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to