Pete Dennis wrote:

> Done. Looking at the others there - there is the babel_install.p5m
> which has a dependency upon slim_install and so looks to be another
> candidate for removal - and so I have removed it.

Thanks; I meant to mention it, and then it slipped my mind.

> https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/onnv/petede/group_package_ownership/webrev/
> 
> >And I think this is the case, but can you confirm that the mere removal of
> >the manifests causes them to disappear from ips-incorporation?
> 
> yeap that is correct - I noticed this and we will need to ensure
> that the packages are incorporated into the RE incorporation
> (comment in 7167737 is there to reflect that).

Yes, though it's not critical that it be done precisely.

Change looks good.

Thanks,
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to