On Dec 22 12:09, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:39:29PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > > retitle josm: Please package new upstream version > > thanks > > > > [Alex Ruddick] > > > NOTE: I run Ubuntu and have never submitted a proper Debian bug, so > > > I modified an earlier one. I have no idea if this is the proper way > > > to ask for updated packaging, but it seems worth a try. > > > > Very close, at least. :) > > > > > Besides the packaging, the homepage has changed, and I added an > > > upstream contact. > > > > I agree that a new version should be packaged, but believe it is best > > to wait until Lenny is released before uploading a new version into > > unstable. A new version could be uploaded into experimental until > > then. I do not have the spare time left to do it myself, and hope > > some of the other debian gis people find time to do it. > > > > Happy hacking, > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn release) > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ?
My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version. Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel