On Dec 22  21:07, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 22/12/2008 alle 15.14 +0100, Andreas Putzo ha scritto:
> > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn 
> > > release)
> > > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ? 
> > 
> > My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal
> > preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision
> > which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version.
> I think too it's better to use the svn release versioning, which is
> easier to match with the upstream status than the timstamp. And also the
> "more or less stable" revision is a good idea, because makes us able to
> select the better version to package.

That's something upstream introduced. Because they don't want to or don't
have time to provide a stable josm vesion they agreed on linking one
svn revision that is considered more or less stable. 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to