On Dec 22 21:07, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Il giorno lun, 22/12/2008 alle 15.14 +0100, Andreas Putzo ha scritto: > > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn > > > release) > > > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ? > > > > My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal > > preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision > > which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version. > > I think too it's better to use the svn release versioning, which is > easier to match with the upstream status than the timstamp. And also the > "more or less stable" revision is a good idea, because makes us able to > select the better version to package.
That's something upstream introduced. Because they don't want to or don't have time to provide a stable josm vesion they agreed on linking one svn revision that is considered more or less stable. Cheers, Andreas
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel