On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:

Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did a
local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.


What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed on digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine.

Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my system...

-- eric



_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

Reply via email to